Same Same, but Different #18— Parachain vs Sidechain

As blockchains grow, they need ways to scale and handle more use cases. Two popular solutions are parachains and sidechains. Both run in parallel to a base blockchain and extend its capabilities, but they work differently.

What Are Parachains?

Parachains are blockchains that connect to a central relay chain for security and coordination. The best-known example is Polkadot, where parachains plug into its relay chain for shared validation and seamless communication.

• Security: Parachains rely on the relay chain’s validators, which makes them more secure.
  
  
• Interoperability: Built-in cross-chain communication between parachains.
  
  
• Trade-off: Slots are limited, and projects must compete (often via auctions) to connect.
  
  

Think of parachains as branches of the same tree, all growing from one secure trunk.

What Are Sidechains?

Sidechains are independent blockchains that connect to a main chain via bridges. Unlike parachains, they maintain their own validators, consensus, and governance.

• Flexibility: Developers can design their own rules and use cases.
  
  
• Independence: They don’t need to compete for slots on a central chain.
  
  
• Trade-off: Security depends on the sidechain’s validators and bridge design — which can create vulnerabilities.
  
  

Sidechains are like separate highways linked by bridges, able to run at their own speed but still connected.

Key Differences

Why It Matters

Both parachains and sidechains aim to scale blockchains and enable specialization:

• Parachains emphasize shared security and smooth interoperability.
  
  
• Sidechains focus on independence and flexibility.
  
  

Neither approach is “better”, it depends on whether a project values collective security or the freedom to experiment.

Learn more blockchain basics with Bitazza on our blog and trade 100+ tokens.